VIDEO: Should Maryland Abolish the Death Penalty?
Share your thoughts about efforts in Annapolis to repeal the state's capital punishment law.
Proposed legislation to repeal Maryland's death penalty is scheduled to be heard by state lawmakers in the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Wednesday afternoon in Annapolis.
Before the hearing, supporters of repeal are set to hold an 11:30 a.m. press conference Wednesday in the House Office Building with NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous and relatives of murder victims. The two bills pending in the Senate and House have 85 co-sponsors between them.
Repeal advocates are expected to argue that years of death penalty appeals torment families of murder victims who otherwise would never hear from a defendant sentenced to life in prison.
Patch caught up with Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger—who supports the death penalty—and Kirk Bloodsworth, the state's leading anti-death penalty advocate, to help frame the debate. (See video.)
Tell us your opinion in comments below.
Both Shellenberger and Bloodsworth offer passionate reasons for their opinions on the death penalty.
Shellenberger said there needs to be an "ultimate punishment" for those who commit certain heinous acts, including the killing of a police officer or the murder of a correctional officer by a prisoner.
"What do you tell the family of a correctional officer when a defendant is already serving life for murder and then they killed your loved one?" Shellenberger said. "There has to be an ultimate penalty."
Bloodsworth served eight years, 10 months and 19 days in prison, including two years on death row, for the 1984 murder of a 9-year-old girl in Rosedale. DNA evidence exonerated him of the crime and Bloodsworth was released from prison in 1993.
"Honestly, after what happened to me, no one can say it can’t happen again..." Bloodsworth said. "We need to get rid of it."
Currently, Maryland has five defendants sitting on death row, including three who have avoided being executed since 1983.
The state has executed five men since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, the last being Wesley Baker in 2005 for the 1991 murder of grandmother Jane Tyson. She was shot and killed during an armed robbery in a Catonsville parking lot in front of her 6-year-old granddaughter and 4-year-old grandson.
Since Baker's execution, Maryland has established some of the most stringent policies in the country for prosecutors to seek the death penalty. Shellenberger said since 2009 capital cases in the state are limited to those with "biological or DNA evidence proving guilt, a videotaped confession or a videotape that can link the defendant to a homicide."
Those restrictions, Shellenberger said, practically eliminates the chances of someone being wrongly convicted of capital murder and offer enough safeguards to ensure those improperly imprisoned—like Bloodsworth—are freed.
Baltimore County has only sought the death penalty twice since the new restrictions were put in place, Shellenberger said. Both cases involved defendants in the 2010 murder of Hess gas station owner William "Ray" Porter.
Walter Bishop was sentenced in November to life with the possibility of parole after shooting Porter twice at the East Joppa Road station in Towson after he told police he was promised $9,000 from Porter's wife, Karla.
Shellenberger said he will seek the death penalty against Karla Porter, who is scheduled to go to trial later this year.
"I believe that Maryland right now has the most restrictive death penalty statute in the country," Shellenberger said. "[The legislature has] added conditions to our death penalty statute that basically said you can not rely solely on eyewitness testimony, that if you want to go forward with a death penalty case you would also need DNA linking the defendant to the crime, or a video taped confession or an actual video of the murder taking place itself."
Bloodsworth counters that the justice system is far from perfect. He stated that 140 death row inmates have been wrongly convicted in the United States and 280 people have been cleared of crimes through DNA, including 17 on death row.
Bloodsworth also cited the work of the Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment which recommended in 2008 that the state should repeal the death penalty for fear of executing an innocent person along with concerns over racial and geographic disparities.
Bloodsworth added that that requiring someone to spend the rest of their life in prison is a far worse punishment than having that person executed.
"The crime that I was accused of, and ultimately went to death row for and was later exonerated, the real perpetrator after the fact was never given the death penalty," Bloodsworth said. "I think that it's a better punishment for people because they have to sit in this place for the rest of their lives knowing what they did."
The question is: Where do you stand on repealing Maryland's death penalty? Share your answers in the comments section below.
Ryan Stavely
9:52 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Sorry, but the cost of making a mistake is too high, and the number of people that have been exonerated off of death row is scary. It's tough to wrap my mind around the fact that we have very likely executed someone that was innocent.
I would support keeping the death penalty if the bar was raised significantly such that there was no doubt whatsoever about the guilt of the person.
j jones
8:58 am on Friday, March 9, 2012
I agree if the evidence is solid that the death penalty should be applied, particularly in certain cases.
edward myers
6:01 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012
well tell the marines that the state does not have the right to take life , as the post i was replying to stated, also if you worry about executing an inocent person after all of the automatic appeals, you must be beside your self at all of the innocent people being shot and killed almost every day in this country by police who thought that they are armed yet no one is trying to abolish police procedures that allow police to fire first even though this would stop innocent lives from being lost .the fact is that the guilty get plea bargins and that bothers me too, the idea that an innocent man defending himself has a better chance of getting the death penulty than a guilty man taking a bargin, but the problem is getting the leagal system to cost less and if you have a case with video or dna or video and dna than conviction and execution should be quick and cheap.
Lois Anderson Amos
2:41 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Killing is wrong, no matter who's doing it.
How a state can punish a killer by killing the killer makes no sense to me.
DioDingo
4:06 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Then what would be a suitable punishment for killing? Having one of your family members choosen at random to be murdered seems a bit extream.
Ryan Stavely
6:07 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Life without Parole. Cheaper, too.
edward myers
12:49 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
tell it to the marines
Ryan Stavely
1:43 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
What exactly do the Marines have to do with it?
Scott DiBiasio
5:02 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
What if someone confessed (after having access to counsel, not under any undue duress, psychologically stable, etc.) to killing 100 people? I think that is pretty good evidence of their guilt. This proposed law would not allow that person to be sentenced to death. Further, what about someone who actually wishes to be put to death rather than have to serve a LWOP sentence? Shouldn't they have that choice? Sure, this is a cop out - death is probably easier than LWOP - but it sure as heck would save the government a lot of money. This bill would not allow someone who WANTS to be put to death to request that punishment...and there have been cases of such.
Ryan Stavely
6:08 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
If they really want to die that bad, I'm sure they can find a way. They shouldn't really get a preference and be given a chance to take the easy way out.
John
8:07 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
I can't think of a possible worse punishment than to spend the rest of your life in jail without the possibility of parole.
just_my_opinion
12:58 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012
Yes......execute them........ If you factor in everything it takes around $48,000 of your hard earned money per year to house, feed, secure, health care for just one lifetime inmate. Put that money in schools, how many starving children would that $48,000 feed? It may sound cold on my part but I feel there are far more positive things that could be done with that money than waste it on someone that got where there are by their own hand.
Ryan Stavely
6:31 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012
As I said above, the cost of housing them in prison for life is cheaper than the death penalty. Counterintuitive, but true.
http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/CostsDPMaryland.pdf
Amy Leahy
6:37 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012
Ryan how can LWOP possibly be cheaper than the death penalty? That doesn't make any kind of sense to me. I do agree that there should be no doubt of the heinous crime and the criminal's guilt before the death penalty is pronounced.
Ryan Stavely
6:40 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012
If you click on that link in my post, you can read the wholy study that researched the costs and all will be explained.
edward myers
1:00 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
it is because the lawyers want it that way , with dna and video evidence it should not take many years and repeat appeals this is sickening these people cared not at all for the lives that they took and in many cased the evidence is incontrovertable, there was one case where a man was robbing a convieniance store a teenaged boy walks in and picks up a bag of chips unaware that the place being robbged, tghe animal shoots the boy and while screaming at him I told you to stand still mother f--ker and kicks the wounded child repeatedly, and to save money the prosecuter plea bargianed it to manslaughter the person recieved five years and the victims family watched thier child shot twice and repeatedly kicked , over and over again. yeah that animal is sure not to harm anyone else. Hanged in a crows cage he would harm no one else for sure
John
8:22 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012
@just_my_opinion - it's actually cheaper to jail them for life. In fact, there's not a single study that has not reached that conclusion.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29552692/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/execute-or-not-question-cost/#.T1iyEM0V01s
edward myers
12:31 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
than perhaps we shouls stop paying prosecuters so much it seams that with video and dna evidenc we could streamline this or how about limiting how much blood sucking lawyers are allowed, to make what we need is a break down of who is getting paid what because it seems that the lawyers making the laws have intentionaly aranged it so that they can maximize the amount they can make,how for instance can it be cheaper to pay for 24/7 housing and guarding than the small amount of hours actually spent on these cases by the lawyers.
Ryan Stavely
12:33 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
I suggest that perhaps you read the study linked above to gain an understanding of what the cost drivers are for both scenarios. Then perhaps you can come up with realistic ways of reducing costs.
just_my_opinion
6:33 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
I don't see how there can be a $50,000 per year difference in the cost of housing a LWOP inmate and a DR inmate. As a former corrections officer of a max security prison the LWOP inmates were locked down 23 hours of the day just like the DR inmates are......personally I think it's like just about every other govt agency and the numbers are so far inflated it isn't funny. I guess for me it also boils down to why should we support this person to live for the rest of his life when his victim(s) are dead and his family has to suffer for the rest of their lives.
Ryan Stavely
7:57 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
One one hand we have facts.
On the other we have the opinion of some random person on the internet.
I think I'll stick to the facts.
Francis Coombs
10:24 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012
What death penalty? Maryland has it on the books but has only used it once in years. Death penalty opponents have successfully tied it up in court and wrapped it in politically-motivated "studies" as far back as any of us can remember. Either use it or get rid of it, and then deal with the consequences.
edward myers
12:19 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
life without parol cheaper? what idiot came up with that it costs between, $85,000, and $140,000, a year to house these people and the cost will just go up as the prisoner ages ,the only reason i can think of opposing the death penulty is the risk of convicting innocent people so if there is absolute proof without a shadow of a doubt execution is the only sencible answer,and don't give me that guff about it not stopping the crime to many times we read of convicted murderers getting out on parole and within a short time span murdering someone else these at least would have been prevented as for the man wrongfully convicted of murdering that little girl,he actually spent time in the same cell with the murderer and when the prosecuter that got the conviction on him the soiled panties of the little girl was found in the bottom drawer of his desk that is why it took so long to exonerate him. why did the prosectuer hide the exculpatory evidence?if he was not hideing it why would he have soiled panties from a murdered little girl in his drawer? especially when everybody was trying to find that piece of evidence , and when are we going to start punishing prosecuters for this. you know one of the most misquoted pieces of the bible is an eye for an eye however this was in cases of bearing false witness like the prosecuter in his case, maybe if we instituted the same policy toward with holding excupatory evidence some of this problem would not exist.
edward myers
12:35 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012
actually the one proisoner Gov goerge bush of texas granted cutation of a death penulty was an old man who sent him a letter and convinced him of his repentance and after the commutation he made a deal with authorities and led them to over 100 gravew sites with remains of young women he had killed. so even life without parole may not be safe if the criminal is born again and the right idiot becomes governor he might find his way back to killing
j jones
9:26 am on Friday, March 9, 2012
Other than extreme cases, particularly when there is DNA evidence or other concrete evidence, I definitely believe in the death penalty. I would think statistics show that in the majority of criminals, such as hard-core, rehabilitation does not work. And I for one, don't feel like taking care of them. Take a look at Charles Manson - the state of California is still taking care of him, can only imagine what they have spent on his care - what an affront to the people that were slaughtered by his crew. And no, he did not participate in the killings, he was the catalyst behind them.