Fear of Gun Control Drives Gun Sales Sky High in Maryland
By Rashee Raj Kumar, Capital News Service
- January 18, 2013
Fears of new gun control regulations proposed by President Barack Obama and Gov. Martin O’Malley have intensified sales at Maryland gun shops.
While the boost in sales has bolstered gun dealer’s profits, it has also led to a shortage in the supply of guns in the state, especially assault rifles, gun shop owners said.
"Everybody is panicking. Every day has been absolutely crazy for the last three weeks," Henry Calvert, president of Calvert Firearms, Inc. in North East, a town in Cecil County, said of his customers. “It’s a bear market. Everyone is purchasing everything that comes in."
Obama proposed a set of gun control regulations on Wednesday, which included a universal background check for all gun sales and a ban on military-style assault weapons. On Friday, O’Malley proposed a similar ban on assault weapons in Maryland and limits on the size of magazines.
The increase in gun sales in Maryland predates the proposals in Annapolis and Washington, according to gun shop owners and FBI background check statistics. Gun shop owners said the increase started in October, in response to discussions of new gun control regulations during the presidential debates and intensified following the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut in December.
In November and December 2012, the FBI National Instant Criminal Background Check System processed 36,220 background checks for gun purchases in Maryland. During the same two months in 2011, the agency processed 24,376 background checks for gun purchases in Maryland. That represents a 49 percent increase from 2011 to 2012.
The National Instant Criminal Background Check System allows Federal Firearms Licensed gun dealers to quickly learn if prospective customers are eligible to buy a firearm.
Background check data for January is not yet available. But gun shop owners said the strong sales have continued into January, and they expect them to increase as state and national lawmakers debate new gun control measures more intensely.
Andrew Raymond, co-owner of Engage Armament in Rockville, saw exponential sales growth in December. In the four days following the Sandy Hook shooting on Dec. 14, his store did 10 times more business that he had anticipated. He expected to sell $25,000 worth of merchandise and ended up selling $260,000.
The increase in profits came in part because he raised his prices in response to strong market demand. He noticed that competitors were selling weapons he stocked for significantly more money than he was. For one particular assault rifle, he raised the price from $1,200 to $2,000.
"Basically, we ended up raising our prices to meet the demand," Raymond said. "I don't like that personally. It doesn't feel good."
While business is strong now, Raymond said he is concerned about the future.
“What we specialize in as a business is assault rifles,” he said.
Assault rifles account for 60 to 70 percent of Engage Armament’s business, while handguns account for the rest. A federal or state ban on assault rifles could force him out of business, he said.
Michael Faith, the marketing director at Hendershot's Sporting Goods in Hagerstown, said that sales have been brisk for the past few months. The uptick started the day after the second presidential debate on Oct. 16, when Obama mentioned renewing the assault weapons ban.
“The sales are fear driven right now,” Faith said. Although Faith was not in the gun business when the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban passed, he deals with suppliers who have been in the industry for more than 20 years. His suppliers told him that they are seeing demand today that they have never seen before.
“From a business standpoint, sales have been good,” Faith said. “I can sell every handgun and AR-15 I can get, but the problem is supply. I think that's the difference this time.”
Faith also has concerns about any new proposed gun control legislation.
“New York passed legislation that bans anything over seven rounds. If Maryland passes legislation like New York, that affects more than 95 percent of our pistol inventory,” he said. Hendershot's Sporting Goods hired eight new employees to handle increased demand after the second debate. Legislative changes could cost these employees their jobs, Faith said.
Current Maryland Gun Laws:
Handguns:
- 21 years old to purchase
- Sales regulated
- No permit necessary to purchase, however permit is required for concealed carry
- No license to own required
- Registration required through Maryland State Police
- Safety training program through Maryland State Police required
Assault Weapons:
- Currently 30 guns, and their copies, make up the list of assault rifles.
- 21 years old to purchase
- Sales regulated
- No permit necessary to purchase
- No license to own required
- Registration required through Maryland State Police
- Safety training program through Maryland State Police required
Ammunition Magazines:
- Limited to 20-round capacity
- List of three groups of people labeled as prohibited purchasers of firearms: People who have been convicted of a felony or certain misdemeanors, people with a mental illness, drug and alcohol abusers.
Proposed Changes to Maryland Law:
- Complete ban on assault rifle sales
- Reduce magazine capacity to 10-round maximum
- Digital fingerprinting required for handgun ownership; will go into police database
- Updated safety training for handgun ownership
- Not-yet-detailed expansion of definition of an assault rifle
- Require background check for all handgun sales
- Increased focus on mental health/school safety
- Adding people in guardianship, and people who have been court-ordered to a mental treatment facility and are deemed as potentially violent, to the list of prohibited purchasers of firearms
- Creation of Maryland center for school safety
Proposed Changes to Federal Law:
- Increased focus on mental health/school safety
- Close background check loopholes that permit private gun transactions to occur without background checks
- Ban “straw purchasers,” people who purchase firearms for people who would otherwise not be able to obtain them
- Increased investment in local police departments
- Reinstate and expand assault weapon ban of 1994-2004
- 10-round maximum for magazines
- Remove restrictions on the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Bureau to enable it to better enforce regulations
- Establish annual report on lost and stolen guns
- Require all guns be traced from manufacturer to dealer to purchaser
- Ban armor-piercing bullets
Allen Etzler also contributed to this article.
Read More in Government
Gun Bills Top O'Malley Legislative PrioritiesSee More on Patch
Most Popular articles
- Pointer Ridge Elementary Placed Under 'Precautionary' Lockdown Monday
- 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Trailer, Reviews and Showtimes in Bowie
- Michelle Obama to Bowie State Grads: It's Time to Feel Hungry Again
- Visions for Vacancies: Former Curves at Bowie Marketplace
- Burglary Suspects Lead Foot Chase Through South Bowie
Chris Erdle
12:35 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Totally unreasonable and unconstitutional proposals except the increased mental health awareness in schools and the annual report on lost and stolen weapons which are excellent ideas.
Modou Njie
11:45 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Why would someone need a 100 round clip, of a fully automatic gun outside of a gun club is beyond me.
Matt
11:52 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Apparently you have no idea what any of this is about. None of these proposed rules have anything to do with fully automatic weapons. Those have been illegal forever. And nobody is proposing making them legal. Stop contributing to the misinformation and hysteria over weapons.
Rick Hudson
11:55 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Why does anyone need a Corvette? That is the point. Legal gun owners are not the problem.
2009 more people were killed in MD by Fists/feet/etc then by rifles that they now want to limit
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/data/table_20.html
jag
12:04 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Lol, it's safe to say the misinformation goes both ways, huh Rick? For the record: total murders committed by firearms in MD in 2009: 305. Total murder committed by hands, fists, feet, etc.: 18. Also for the record: Corvettes have nothing to do with anything expect for the fact you're obviously disproving your own point: cars require registration, insurance, inspection, training, licensing, etc. yet you, apparently, think simple registration of guns is too burdensome. Hilarious.
Rick Hudson
12:10 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I was referring only to deaths by rifle which was a overwhelmingly huge total= 2. Guns do have legitimate uses also: Hunting, home defense and target shooting. Registration is already required.
jag
12:23 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Could you let me know what part of the proposal you find to be burdensome of "limiting" to your rifle usage and ownership? Steps have specifically been taken to try and minimize the effect on legitimate gun ownership, e.g. "hunting rifles and shotguns are exempted from the proposed licensing program, while rapid-fire assault weapons would be banned." No one is trying to target rifles because, as you say, they have legitimate use and aren't commonly used to, you know, blow people's faces off.
Rick Hudson
12:39 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I find none of it burdensome. I find it offensive that the govt., both state and federal, want to limit my rights. My legitimate use for an assault waepon would be to target shoot large ammounts of ammo at very face pace without reloading as often and home protection. That is enough. Kinda like a Corvette owner wants to go really fast, which is far more illegal and reckless then me popping of 30 rounds at a target in 15 seconds.
The other big point is that this will not stop anything. It isn't addressing the problem. The Super Big picture problem boils down to lack of respect for the law, a lack of respect for life and lack of respect for the people around us by very small but very visible minority of the population ruining something for a very large group that has done nothing wrong at all.
Rick Hudson
12:46 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Also 90% of the assault weapons they are talking about are just semi automatic RIFLES... which killed 2 people in MD last year. I would hardly say that they are used regualrly to blow peoples faces off.
Rick Hudson
12:49 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Sorry 2009, per the link I posted, my apologies for confusing the statistics.
jag
1:51 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Okay, so this isn't actually about hunting rifles, as you originally brought up. You just think you should have, as you say, the right to shoot 30 rounds in 15 seconds. Unfortunately for you, you're in the minority and society, as a whole, is tending towards refuse to allow you that capability of mass carnage. Sorry. Could always move to Afghanistan, I guess.
Modou Njie
1:59 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
He doesn't have to move to Afghanistan, may be join a gun club or the feds/authorities can provide free shooting ranges...
Rick Hudson
2:10 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
YES!!! And as a matter of fact that right is constitutionally protected. Just like your right to spout off about something you dont understand.
jag
2:28 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Uh, no, FYI "right to shoot 30 rounds in 15 seconds" isn't protected under the Constitution. I may not be a gun nut, but I do have a JD, so I can assure you you're also "spout off about something you dont understand."
Modou Njie
2:36 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
JAG, Does the constitution protect ammunition? Limiting that may be part of the solution... One gets a fully automatic weapon but can only fire 10 rounds, constitutional right satisfied!...
Modou Njie
12:12 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Sorry if I was misleading, that was not my intention. I have to admit, I don't know much about guns. Educate me, why would someone need armor-piercing bullets, or stand in the way of universal background checks? Also, I thought the assault weapons band expired, no?
Matt
7:40 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I have no problem with background checks. And I have no problem restricting armor piercing ammo to LE/MIL only. But armor piercing ammo is not a problem now anyway. It sounds mean and terrible, so it is just an easy buzz word for politicians to incite fear.
Yes the AWB expired a long time ago. It was a pointless ban that functionally accomplished nothing. Reinstating it would once again functionally accomplish nothing. The very definition of an assault weapon, which was written by politicians knowing nothing about guns, is having components that make it look scary. Absolutely nothing to do with the function, bullets, what it fires, how it fires, where it fires, etc. The bullets a scary looking rifle fires are no different than a handgun, or even a single shot bolt action rifle. No gun shoots bullets that give their target a loving hug and turn into a unicorn.
It is ALL 110% political grandstanding.
Rick Hudson
12:55 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
That is the truth!!! All crime continued to drop after the assault weapons ban was lifted in 2008 (I think i have that year right).
The problem is a high capacity magazine, a bullet or an assault weapon never hurt anything or anyone with out a person intent on doing harm behind it, That is the root of this problem that needs fixing, not limitation of rights on law abiding citizens.